If i run the script, how come the resulting apl says “Unversioned directory” as to the SVN number?
> On 2015-05-13, at 07:20, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Here is a safer version: > > # > cd ~/Backup > rm -rf apl > mkdir apl > cd apl > cp -rp ../gnu-apl.svn/* . > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > > > On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 6:15 AM, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com > <mailto:blake1...@gmail.com>> wrote: > I build with the following script: > > # > cd ~/Backup > mkdir apl > cd apl > rm -rf * > cp -rp ../gnu-apl.svn/* . > ./configure > make > sudo make install > > > This way my SVN copy is never touched. > > Blake > > > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 9:45 AM, Juergen Sauermann > <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote: > Hi Louis, > > The SVN number is written by ./configure, so if you want it to be correct > then you need to > re-run ./configure after svn update. But that number not too relevant so > skipping this ./configure > is normally OK. > > The more important question is that of dependencies. The default ./configure > selects a "fast install" that > skips some dependency checks. For a packet installed from the GNU APL project > tar file that is OK but > when working with SVN it is not because some changes in .hh and .def files > will not be noticed. Therefore, > when working from the SVN repository, you should do one of the following: > > 1. make clean after (every) svn update (OK but not optimal) > 2. ./configure with --enable-maintainer-mode (and possibly other options) > 3. make develop after the first ./configure > > 3. does 2. and a few more useful things like enabling assertions and dynamic > logging. > See README-2-configure for details. > > 2. is needed only once and stays until the next ./configure (which makes it > better than 1.) > > You should also always do a make install, otherwise you could get conflicts > between the apl > binary and shared libraries if you start a new apl binary and it uses old > shared libraries. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 05/12/2015 03:47 PM, Louis Chretien wrote: >> After doing an update of my local working copy, with: >> >> svn update ./apl >> >> What are the commands required to rebuild APL? >> >> Right now, through trials and erros, i’ve come up with: >> >> make distclean (it seems that make clean is not enough, because the >> resulting APL doesn’t have the new SVN number) >> ./configure >> make >> >> Are there any other ways to do this? better? >> >> Thanks, >> >> --- >> Louis Chrétien >> lchret...@mac.com <mailto:lchret...@mac.com> >> >> >> >> > > > --- Louis Chrétien lchret...@mac.com
