Hi Christian, see my answers inline below... /// Jürgen On 02/19/2015 03:10 AM, Christian
Robert wrote:
I was to report that this APL _expression_ I am currently working on the next GNU APL release 1.5 which will include all fixes for bugs reported since GNU APL 1,4. The bug above is one of them.
1. those things are probably not very hard to implement. However: 2. I try to minimize non-standard extensions of GNU APL because every such extension creates incompatibilities of APL programs that are using them. My idea of free software is that not only GNU APL itself should be free but also APL programs running on GNU APL. And for a free APL program to be useful it is important that is is portable between different APL interpreters. an other thing really missing is a native ")edit function_name" I believe Elias has responded to that. I would add that you now can create user defined commands yourself :-) . My personal working mode is that I edit an APL script in one xterm with vi and run that script in a second xterm from the command line. nevertheless I'm quite pleased with "GNU APL" (2 days old installation) Thanks!
|
- [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Christian Robert
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Blake McBride
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Juergen Sauermann
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Blake McBride
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Elias Mårtenson
- Re: [Bug-apl] Question about GNU APL Christian Robert