Hi Jürgen, Thanks for doing the analysis.
> 2. Alternatives > --------------------- > > I have tested what happens if we would introduce a M M pattern into GNU APL > in order to > get IBM APL2's behavior. I don't understand this bit. Monadic operators don't bind like this in APL2. Surely the way to get APL2 behaviour is: - never downgrade / to a function - introduce an A M pattern to allow operators to have arrays as left operands Jay.
