Re: [Bug-apl] Newly introduced bug

[Juergen Sauermann]

Hi Blake, that is exactly how things work already. Your case was just missing; I have added it. /// Jürgen On 10/02/2014 06:18 PM, Blake McBride wrote: Dear Juergen, That fixed the problem.  Thanks.  However, this scares me a little bit - random basic functionality failing.  Perhaps I can suggest the following. Create a test suite that, for now, just tests a bench of somewhat random stuff that you think are good tests.  Then, every time someone reports a problem, such as this one, you can add it to the test suite.  This way we'd be sure that there is some coverage going on and that old bugs don't reappear.  Perhaps it can be run with "make test". Please let me know if you think this is a good idea but you don't have time for it.  Perhaps I, or someone else on the list, will do it. Thanks. Blake On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: Hi Blake, thanks, fixed in SVN  483. /// Jürgen On 10/02/2014 01:58 PM, Blake McBride wrote: IBM APL2:       'Y'∨.≠2 2⍴'X' 1 1 GNU APL:       'y'∨.≠2 2⍴'x' LENGTH ERROR       'y'∨.≠2 2⍴'x'       ^    ^ Thanks. Blake