Thank you. I've added it, but with a small change. The format is now NAME (space) NC
Regards, Elias On 28 August 2014 22:57, Chris Moller <mol...@mollerware.com> wrote: > Hi, Elias, > > I have indeed started adding a few APL-interaction features to aplwrap, > one of the first of which uses your "variables" command, which leads me to > a request: a variation in VariablesCommand.cc of "cls = ALL" that tags the > entries in the returned list with their name classes. That makes it > possible for me to get all the non-system functions and variables in one > transaction and still differentiate between functions and variables. I've > attached a proposed patch. > > Thanks, > Chris > > > On 08/13/14 23:28, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > > Hello Chris, > > I've been following the discussions about the GTK wrapper, and while I'm > not using it myself (since I work on the Emacs integration) I realise that > there are plenty of (potential) overlaps between our projects. > > In particular, I want to let you know about the Emacs mode backchannel > protocol that the mode uses for directly communicating with the GNU APL > interpreter. When started, if gives you a simple text-based protocol > through which you can do things such as defining functions or creating > listeners that send you a message whenever a variable is changed (this is > used by the realtime variable watcher). > > It would be neat if you were to consider implementing some of the > feature I added to the Emacs mode, and if you do it would be useful if you > used the same protocol as I am using. > > Please let me know if you have any questions. > > Regards, > Elias > > >
