Hi,
my point is that there should be no difference between lambdas and
defined functions.
The reason that the left argument is ignored is that dyadic functions
can be called monadically
(the presence of the left argument *can* be checked with *⎕NC* but it
does not have to be checked.)
But even in this case lambdas and defined functions behave in the the
same way.
What you are arguing for is that lambdas and defined functions shall
behave differently
in the niladic case. This maybe convenient at times but would increase
the complexity
of the syntax and could come as a surprise for many others
/// Jürgen
On 08/07/2014 03:58 PM, Jay Foad wrote:
Right. Even in GNU APL monadic lambdas consume and ignore any left
argument you give them, so you could argue that it's consistent for
niladic lambdas to consume and ignore both arguments.
Jay.
On 7 August 2014 14:53, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote:
And, one could argue that knowing that lambdas are always variadic is quite
consistent in itself.
