Do you think there is a way to configure that? Perhaps disable the double-thing when in Emacs mode? The reason is that in Emacs mode you already have to press C-c twice to send a sinvlde C-c to the underlying process. That means that in order to interrupt right now I need to press it 4 times within 500 ms, which is very difficult.
Regards, Elias On 3 August 2014 00:27, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi Blake, > > good. The double ^C is on purpose to avoid accidentally hitting ^C. > > Its actually two ^C within 500 ms. > > /// Jürgen > > > > > On 08/02/2014 05:40 PM, Blake McBride wrote: > > Dear Juergen, > > It prints immediately. Great!!! > > Last thing, if I could just ^C out of the middle of printing ⍳100000 > but I could ^C^C out! > (I understand this may be a readline issue that'll have to wait.) > > Thanks! > > Blake > > > > On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:25 AM, Juergen Sauermann < > juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > >> Hi Blake, >> >> I did some rework of the print functions for APL values. >> Some were not suited for values with many columns. >> That should work better now. SVN 413. >> >> /// Jürgen >> >> >> >> On 08/01/2014 06:30 PM, Blake McBride wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Juergen Sauermann < >> juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: >> >>> Hi Blake, >>> >>> unfortunately the rules for APL output are such that you cannot "print >>> as you go". >>> >> >> >> Try ⍳100000 >> >> That should be able to print as you go - IBM APL does. Right now there >> is a significant delay - that I presume is unnecessarily using a >> significant amount of memory to hold the formatted string. >> >> Of course, you still can't ^C out of that either - but that's a different >> matter. >> >> I understand that in many situations you must format the whole thing >> before you can can see how it lays out. But that is not true in cases >> where it clearly doesn't fit (like ⍳100000) and many, many cases where it >> is too large to have a reasonable format. Those are the cases when >> print-as-you-go can be done and would be without delay, and save >> significant memory - and hopefully easier to interrupt. >> >> Thanks. >> >> Blake >> >> >> >> > >