Well, that would be great too. My parsing of the comments right now is very simple, and I can easily change it if a different approach is proposed.
If anything more complex than just a simple block of text is decided upon, I can add features to the Emacs mode to provide syntax highlighting and structural edit features for the documentation. Regards, Elias On 16 July 2014 23:27, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote: > Hi, > > sorry, I sent this one to the wrong topic.., > > /// Jürgen > > > On 07/14/2014 08:14 PM, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > > Hi, > > my favourite for code documentation is *Doxygen*. It does not currently > support APL comments but we might be able to change that. Or use one > of the existing tags like --- for *VHDL* or %%% for *Erlang*. > > It would need some changes in GNU APL - multi-line comments and > proper storage of documentation information in the function so that it > can de *)DUMP*ed without loosing that information. > > /// Jürgen > > > > >
