I was looking at your code, and I noticed that it's SQLite-specific.
WOuldn't it make sense to make it SQL-implementation-agnostic?

Based on what I can see, the only SQLite-specific SQL you have in there is
"replace into" which I had never heard about before.

Regards,
Elias


On 9 July 2014 01:22, David Lamkins <da...@lamkins.net> wrote:

> I haven't yet written test scripts, but I've informally tested all of the
> functions and am reasonably confident that the component file API is
> complete and correct.
>
> If you'd like to try out the API while I'm working on scripted test cases,
> the repo is:
>
> https://github.com/TieDyedDevil/iso-apl-cf
>
> You'll find documentation is in the comments and in Annex A of the ISO
> 13751 standard.
>
> The standard "specifies a minimal set of functions which a conforming
> implementation must provide"; I've implemented all of these. I've also
> added several useful functions not mentioned in the standard, including
> component inquiry, component drop, and transaction support.
>
> Note that the code is not packaged for my package manager; I assume that
> the component file implementation would become an L3 library in the event
> it's adopted for inclusion in GNU APL.
>
> Júergen, I've specified the GPLv3 license since that's what GNU APL uses.
> If there's a more appropriate choice of license for this library, please
> let me know.
>
> --
> "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
>    Albert Einstein
>
>
> http://soundcloud.com/davidlamkins
> http://reverbnation.com/lamkins
> http://reverbnation.com/lcw
> http://lamkins-guitar.com/
> http://lamkins.net/
> http://successful-lisp.com/
>

Reply via email to