Hi,

thanks, done in SVN 341.

/// Jürgen


On 06/25/2014 11:06 PM, David Lamkins wrote:
Good solution. Thanks!


On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com <mailto:blake1...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    I like it.  Thanks!


    On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Juergen Sauermann
    <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de
    <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote:

        Hi,

        thanks, I will change )LIB to ]LIB and make )LIB APL2 compliant.
        In )LIB no extension will be shown and a + will be printed
        after the
        workspace name if both an .apl and an .xml exist in the directory.

        /// Jürgen



        On 06/25/2014 06:51 PM, Blake McBride wrote:
        Dear David,

        I proposed something similar to your proposal before but it
        was nixed.  My current proposal allows for differences of
        opinion as this issue is becoming increasingly problematic to me.

        Not displaying the .xml or .apl is a new idea - one that is
        also important to me.

        Thanks.

        Blake


        On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 11:29 AM, David Lamkins
        <da...@lamkins.net <mailto:da...@lamkins.net>> wrote:

            As much as I agree with the notion of cleaning up the
            )LIB display, I'm not a fan of using configuration
            options to change UI behavior. May I suggest an alternative?

            1) Change the )LIB command to behave as-if GNU APL only
            deals with workspace files.
            2) Add a new command - )LIBX, perhaps - to show all of
            the files that GNU APL may load.

            ---------- Forwarded message ----------

                From: Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com
                <mailto:blake1...@gmail.com>>
                To: "bug-apl@gnu.org <mailto:bug-apl@gnu.org>"
                <bug-apl@gnu.org <mailto:bug-apl@gnu.org>>
                Cc:
                Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 19:24:37 -0500
                Subject: [Bug-apl] Notes on )LIB

                Greetings,

                I split my large utilities ws into many package ws'.
                 Now my )LIB command is becoming unwieldy.  I noticed
                the language manual states that )LIB returns
                an alphabetized list.  That is the first issue.

                I would really prefer not to see .bak files or really
                _any_ other file that can't be loaded by APL.  If I
                have 8 workspaces, I am seeing 16 files in random
                order.  I would love to have some configuration
                options to show what I see with )LIB as follows.

                LIB_EXTENSIONS = set to a list of file extensions to
                show during )LIB.  If nothing is set, show all files.

                SHOW_EXTENSION = if set to NO, do not show file
                extensions so that my workspace "Utils.xml" would
                just be displayed as "Utils".

                (Yes, I know I could have Utils.apl and Utils.xml.
                 If I hide the extension - it is my problem.)

                Thanks.

                Blake



-- "The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your
            sources."
               Albert Einstein


            http://soundcloud.com/davidlamkins
            http://reverbnation.com/lamkins
            http://reverbnation.com/lcw
            http://lamkins-guitar.com/
            http://lamkins.net/
            http://successful-lisp.com/







--
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
   Albert Einstein


http://soundcloud.com/davidlamkins
http://reverbnation.com/lamkins
http://reverbnation.com/lcw
http://lamkins-guitar.com/
http://lamkins.net/
http://successful-lisp.com/

Reply via email to