Hi Elias,
OK, I will do nothing.
BTW I have separated the )commands from the APL statements in
Command::process_line().
/// Jürgen
On 06/12/2014 05:58 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
That might be a solution. However, let's not do it just yet. It may be
that once I have gotten the rest of the user interface in place there
may be a more obvious thing that should be done.
Regards,
Elias
On 12 Jun 2014 17:55, "Juergen Sauermann"
<juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>>
wrote:
Hi Elias,
normally )CLEAR does the job. Could be that some .so files remain
loaded but that should
not matter. So I could simply redirect )OFF to )CLEAR under android.
/// Jürgen
On 06/12/2014 05:48 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
Well, this is arguably not the biggest issue right now. ☺ It is,
however, something I came across during my experimentation.
I have to admit that I'm not sure what is the logical thing to do
when receiving the )OFF command. Android applications generally
never exits. I suppose doing a full restart of the APL
interpreter is the most logical thing to do.
Is there a way to do this without exiting?
Regards,
Elias
On 12 Jun 2014 17:43, "Juergen Sauermann"
<juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de
<mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote:
Hi Elias,
we have the HAVE_ANDROID macro already, so I can return from )OFF
without doing anything under android.
Note that cmd_OFF is called from other places as well, not
sure how they react if we return instead of exit()-ing.
/// Jürgen
On 06/12/2014 05:20 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
On Android, one does not want )OFF to actually kill the
process itself, since this instantly kills everything,
which is problematic for an Android application.
Of course, I can check the command typed in the input
field before sending it to the interpreter, but with the
arrival of commands being executable, this is not a
complete solution.
Would it make sense to add a callback that I can set that
will be called when the )OFF command is issued, and you
only fall back to the default behaviour if this callback
is NULL?
Regards,
Elias
