It doesn't allow continuation of a stop:
GNU APL:
∇test
[1] '1'
[2] '2'
[3] '3'
[4] '4'
[5] ∇
test
1
2
3
4
S∆test←3
test
1
2
test[3]
→3
test[3]
The branch to 3 should have caused the continuation of the program.
IBM APL 2:
∇TEST
[1] '1'
[2] '2'
[3] '3'
[4] '4'
[5] ∇
TEST
1
2
3
4
S∆TEST←3
TEST
1
2
TEST[3]
→3
3
4
)SI
TEST
1
2
TEST[3]
Thanks.
Blake
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Blake,
>
> thanks, fixed in SVN 316.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
>
> On 06/02/2014 02:20 AM, Blake McBride wrote:
>
>> Just offering an opinion -
>>
>> Since APL trace and stop are quite useful, and are part of the standard,
>> my opinion is that these should be top priority - second only to bug fixes.
>> These should come before work on enhancements or fixes to extensions.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Blake
>>
>>
>
