Unless things settle down for a long while, I'm probably going to hold back the package manager release until GNU APL 1.4 drops. I'd like to be able to say that the package manager works with a binary release rather than requiring "latest SVN".
Also, I'll second Blake's sentiment: GNU APL is great. Thanks so much! On Sat, 2014-05-31 at 19:39 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote: > Hi Blake, > > in principle yes. Normally I wait until the number of emails on bug-apl > goes down a little (which > wasn't the case lately). Creating a release is more work than just > committing a bug-fix to SVN. > > I had also planned a bit more for the next release - multi-core and > better documentation - but > I believe that has to wait for GNU APL 1.5 then. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 05/31/2014 05:30 PM, Blake McBride wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > Just a thought - IMO, GNU APL has come a long way since its last > > release. It is quite a bit more usable than the last release. > > Perhaps a new release is in order? > > > > If not a release now, perhaps there should be a short list of items > > before a new release. > > > > Again, just raising the issue. > > > > Thanks for a great system! > > > > Blake > > > > >
