On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 18:11 -0500, Blake McBride wrote: > Dear David, > > > Thanks for the idiom reference! >
You're welcome. :) > > With a lot of respect, I think you missed my point. The APL 1 idiom > works as you want and expect in APL 1, APL 2, and GNU APL. Look > closely at my example. > > > On the other hand, if it is I who is missing the point (quite > possible), please explain. > No, you're entirely correct. I misunderstood what I was seeing in a different context, I think. Not enough sleep... :( Thanks again.
