Hi David, sorry, no idea where it went. Will be in SVN 297.
/// Jürgen On 05/28/2014 06:59 AM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
Jürgen, I submitted this patch in a slightly different form once before; it didn't make it into GNU APL. After having lived with the patch for a while on my own system, I've updated it to the current form. The gist of the patch is to acknowledge redefinition of a ]usercmd with *identical* arguments as being successful rather than complaining about a "BAD COMMAND". The patch does not change the effect of the command, only the report. With the patch, GNU APL will report "User-defined command ]... installed" each time a command is defined with identical arguments. I think this is a better response than complaining "BAD COMMAND" in the same circumstance, given that the behavior actually succeeded. I hope that you'll apply this patch to GNU APL. Best wishes, David
