I am getting a GPF now:
⍴⍕2 1⍴6
2 1
⍴⍕1 1⍴6
1 1
⍴⍕0 1⍴6
====================================================
SEGMENTATION FAULT
----------------------------------------
-- Stack trace at main.cc:122
----------------------------------------
0x7f11e1cf7de5 __libc_start_main
0x435a55 main
0x52b4ad Workspace::immediate_execution(bool)
0x46526d Command::process_line()
0x464019 Command::process_line(UCS_string&)
0x46eb58 Executable::execute_body() const
0x4e5260 StateIndicator::run()
0x49197a Prefix::reduce_statements()
0x48e464 Prefix::reduce_MISC_F_B_()
0x4e5e4f StateIndicator::eval_B(Token&, Token&)
0x4a68ae Bif_F12_FORMAT::eval_B(Value_P)
0x52395d Value::Value(Shape const&, char const*)
0x7f11e3551bb0
0x47e73a
========================================
====================================================
Goodbye.
Process apl exited abnormally with code 3
The last result should be: 0 0
Also:
⍴⍕,6
1
⍴⍕0⍴0
====================================================
SEGMENTATION FAULT
----------------------------------------
-- Stack trace at main.cc:122
----------------------------------------
0x7f799246fde5 __libc_start_main
0x435a55 main
0x52b4ad Workspace::immediate_execution(bool)
0x46526d Command::process_line()
0x464019 Command::process_line(UCS_string&)
0x46eb58 Executable::execute_body() const
0x4e5260 StateIndicator::run()
0x49197a Prefix::reduce_statements()
0x48e464 Prefix::reduce_MISC_F_B_()
0x4e5e4f StateIndicator::eval_B(Token&, Token&)
0x4a68ae Bif_F12_FORMAT::eval_B(Value_P)
0x52395d Value::Value(Shape const&, char const*)
0x7f7993cc9bb0
0x47e73a
========================================
====================================================
Goodbye.
Process apl exited abnormally with code 3
The last one should be: 0
Thanks.
Blake
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Juergen Sauermann <
juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Blake,
>
> thanks, fixed in SVN 290.
>
> As far as ⍕ is concerned there seems to be no right or wrong.
>
> The IBM APL2 language reference contradicts itself (e.g. pages 135 vs. 136
> for nested values)
> and the ISO standard always wants a result rank ≥ 2 while IBM sometimes
> gives rank = 1.
>
> I have tried my best to make sense out of that.
>
> My approach was even different (rank 1 for one-line output and rank 2
> otherwise) but now
> it should be a little closer to IBM APL2.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
>
> On 05/25/2014 01:20 AM, Blake McBride wrote:
>
>> ⍴⍕,5
>> 1
>> ⍴⍕2 1⍴5
>> 2 1
>> ⍴⍕1 1⍴5
>> 1
>>
>> The final result should have been:
>> 1 1
>>
>> Blake
>>
>>
>
