Hi Elias,

I see, the private use symbols can be made visible with ./configure VISIBLE_MARKERS_WANTED-yes in case you are interested in the details of APL output formatting. They can be removed (visible or not)
with UCS_string::remove_pad() (which returns another UCS_string
with these characters replaced with spaces).

Apart from that everything looks really fine :-) .

You probably want to go for 1. anyhow.

/// Jürgen


On 05/22/2014 03:35 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
Thanks. I tried the second solution, and got the below result. Very strange. Here's the code:

        const PrintContext pctx( PST_NONE, Workspace::get_PP(), 100000 );
        Value_P cr_formatted = Quad_CR::do_CR( cr_level, *value, pctx );

        const PrintContext pctx2( PST_NONE, Workspace::get_PP(), 100000 );
        PrintBuffer buffer( *cr_formatted, pctx2 );
        out << buffer;

Then, this renders as a lot of private use symbols (U+EEEE). I've attached a screenshot of what it looks like.

Regards,
Elias


On 22 May 2014 21:10, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote:

    Hi Elias,

    if the values was a matrix then you may have another problem that
    the matrix has no \n at the end of each row (not sure how your
    output is
    supposed to look like).

    Let say do_CR returns *Value_P Z *(which can be a scalar, a vector, or
    a matrix depending on the value ⎕CRed and the first arg of do_CR().
    Then there are two options:

    1. Check the rank of *Z* with *Z->get_rank()* and

    *   loop(z, Z->**element_count())**
    **      {**
    **         out << **Z->get_ravel(z)**.get_char_value()**;**
    **         // insert \n as needed, i.e.
    z%Z->**get_last_shape_item();**
    **       }**
    *
    2.Construct a PrintBuffer object from Z (with ⎕PW as needed) and

    *   out << **PrintBuffer object;*

    I haven't tested this; 1. seems more reliable (and definitely
    faster) while 2. looks more elegant.


    /// Jürgen



    On 05/22/2014 02:46 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
    Thank you. But I don't see how I can solve my problem then?

    Regards,
    Elias


    On 22 May 2014 20:44, Juergen Sauermann
    <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de
    <mailto:juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>> wrote:

        Hi Elias,

        yes, sorry. Forgot to mention that the APL values used in the
        constructor of UCS_string
        must have rank ≤ 1 while do_CR() might produce matrices for
        some left arguments of ⎕CR.

        /// Jürgen







Reply via email to