On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 12:55 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote: > As for the edit buffer, you can always kill the frame and opening it > again. That's always completely safe, as it never performs any > destructive operation until you press C-c C-c. >
Cool. > You can also undo as far back as you want. I suppose I could add a > revert operation that replaces the content of the edit buffer with the > current function definition from the interpreter. The effect would be > identical to killing the buffer and opening it again. I am curious > though as to what specific workflow you have where you need it. :-) No specific use-case. It's comparable in practice to revert-buffer, which I sometimes use when I' editing a file not under version control.
