Yes indeed. I rebuilt and it works as expected now. Thanks! Blake
*Blake McBride* www.arahant.com Cell: 615-394-6760 Office: 615-376-5500 Fax: 615-377-6006 On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 8:49 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com> wrote: > You most certainly did. I just updated and now it's fixed. Thanks for > that. :-) > > Regards, > Elias > > > On 13 May 2014 21:48, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I thought I did in SVN 262? >> >> /// Jürgen >> >> >> >> On 05/13/2014 03:16 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote: >> >> Yes, that's the bug that was mentioned earlier. The result should be the >> same as ''. Jürgen confirmed this bug, so I'd expect it to be fixed soon. >> :-) >> >> Regards, >> Elias >> >> >> On 13 May 2014 21:14, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Greetings, >>> >>> Not understanding enclose/disclose, I am not sure if this is correct >>> behavior or not. Basicilly, with ]boxing turned on, the following code >>> produces some sort of data item that I cannot re-produce without the pair. >>> Turn on ]boxing and try: >>> >>> ⊃⊂'' >>> >>> or >>> >>> ⊃⊂0⍴0 >>> >>> They produce something that is neither '' nor 0⍴0. As represented by >>> ]boxing, the result is the same as: >>> >>> 1↓⊂'' >>> >>> It is strange because: >>> >>> ⊃⊂,6 >>> >>> is equal to: >>> >>> ,6 >>> >>> It is fine if this is the case. I will work around it. I just wanted >>> to be sure it is correct. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >>> Blake >>> >>> >> >> >
