All right then. Just go ahead and use the library as-is.

If we change something later, a simply search&replace should be easily
applicable to your code. :-)

Regards,
Elias


On 8 May 2014 11:20, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I usually use function names (at least starting) in uppercase, and
> application specific functions in lowercase.  This way I avoid name hits
> between my generic utilities and the application code.  At least it splits
> those two namespaces.
>
> Just an opinion.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Blake
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 10:17 PM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I haven't decided what to do yet. I'd like to have some input from others
>> as to what's the best naming style is. All-lowercase? Upper and lower like
>> the SQL mode now? camelCase?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Elias
>>
>>
>> On 8 May 2014 11:16, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Any luck on getting the SQL library up-to-date?  (I'd like to start work
>>> on the keyed file system, but I am waiting on this fix.)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Blake
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 2:12 AM, Elias Mårtenson <loke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> The SQL library needs to be changed to support the new API. I will fix
>>>> this soon (within a day or so).
>>>>
>>>> I'm also thinking of renaming the functions, making them all lower
>>>> case. This is something that seems more popular.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Elias
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 May 2014 07:19, Blake McBride <blake1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Greetings,
>>>>>
>>>>> I updated GNU APL & Emacs mode and it does appear to work now.  Thanks
>>>>> a lot!  I think I understand the issue but it leads me to the following
>>>>> question.  When loading other libraries (such as sqlite, component file
>>>>> system, etc.) the same issue would arise.  What happens if you open the
>>>>> shared library and then do a )load?  Although a )load should wipe out any
>>>>> APL functions, I wouldn't expect it to unload shared libraries.  I would
>>>>> think shared libraries would represent something at a higher level than a
>>>>> workspace.  It sounds like you fixed this for Emacs mode.  Two questions:
>>>>>
>>>>> Does this fix the problem for the other shared libraries I mentioned?
>>>>>
>>>>> Is there something those shared library authors need to change?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Blake
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 3, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Juergen Sauermann <
>>>>> juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> changed in SVN 243. I also added the caller argument in close_fun()
>>>>>> and in the eval_XXX() functions.
>>>>>> Maybe you want to update back.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /// Jürgen
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 05/03/2014 06:48 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> close_fun in emacs_mode is still declared to return void.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  I've changed the declaration in my development branch. Ideally you
>>>>>> could pick up the updated version.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://github.com/lokedhs/gnu-apl-mode/blob/master/native/emacs.cc#L126
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>> Elias
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4 May 2014 00:41, Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK. I have changed the code so that dlclose() is only performed if
>>>>>>> close_fun() exists and returns true when called. The declaration
>>>>>>> of close_fun() was changed accordingly.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Blake, can you please check if this works? SVN 242.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /// Jürgen
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/03/2014 05:44 PM, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I definitely don't want that. The Emacs library can only be loaded
>>>>>>> once, and it can't be unloaded. It has backend threads working.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  This relates back to the previous discussion we had on the
>>>>>>> feasibility unloading libraries and )CLEAR'ing native functions.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  A native library (at least the Emacs one :-) ) needs a way to
>>>>>>> protect itself from unloading.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Still, )ERASE needs to work, since one obviously needs to be able
>>>>>>> to run it from within Emacs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>>> Elias
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3 May 2014 23:41, Juergen Sauermann <
>>>>>>> juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> maybe a native function is erased? You can turn
>>>>>>>> UserFunction__enter_leave on to see if that happens.
>>>>>>>> You should also get a callback on close_fun() if you have set it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The )LOAD command in Blake's  example does a )CLEAR first which then
>>>>>>>> )ERASE all variables and functions (including native functions). I
>>>>>>>> could
>>>>>>>> reset all callbacks on )CLEAR, but that may kind of disconnect
>>>>>>>> emacs from
>>>>>>>> the interpreter. Not sure if you want that. I would also say that
>>>>>>>> the entity
>>>>>>>> that registers a callback should also clear it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> BTW: If have improved the ]OWNERS display so that sub-values of a
>>>>>>>> variable V,
>>>>>>>> which were incorrectly displayed as having no owner, now show the
>>>>>>>> variable
>>>>>>>> that contains them. SVN 241.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> /// Jürgen
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Reply via email to