Thank you. One more thing: ]usercmd definitions probably shouldn't survive )load and )clear. On May 6, 2014 10:57 AM, "Juergen Sauermann" <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi David. > > thanks. Removing first and printing then was maybe not so smart. SVN 251. > > /// Jürgen > > > On 05/06/2014 06:47 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote: > >> Thank you, Jürgen! That'll do what I need. >> >> FYI, I'm seeing a bit of cruft on the REMOVE: >> >> ]usercmd remove ]foo >> User-defined command \371\217\212\277\200 >> >> (Tested in both gnu-apl-mode [as above] and in a terminal. Only >> difference is that the terminal shows unprintable `?' glyphs instead of >> the escaped values.) >> >> >
