Might i suggest you start a new thread on this ? On Fri, 25 Apr 2014 19:57:32 +0200 Juergen Sauermann <juergen.sauerm...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi, > > OK seems we have some agreements so far: > > 1. namespaces will be delayed at least until we have so many libs that > we need it, > > 2. RPM or debian packaging shall not be used for dependencies, but an > alternative has > not been found yet. the -P tar option might be usefull (i assume you want to control where the libs go?) > > I personally would prefer a solution that also works for other > interpreters without that feature what other interpreters are you talking about ? > (given that some vendors may not wish or be able to implement it). That > would most likely > mean some kind of convention such as: > > Functions and globals vars shall be named xxx∆something for package xxx > > There shall be an init function xxx∆init > There may be xxx∆provides and xxx∆requires functions for dependencies > ... and so on. modeled after php ? > > I can write a document summarizing my thoughts about libraries and > discuss it. > There are many more aspects to consider, but we need to be pragmatic and > simple, > otherwise the whole thing may not take off. sounds exciting nonetheless > > /// Jürgen > >
