Hi,
I have added a workspace "Performance.apl" that gnuplots performance
data nicely.
According to that the sequential time (interpretation + malloc) for V+V
is pretty much 5 uS on my machine,
plus the length-dependant computation time
/// Jürgen
On 03/15/2014 08:23 PM, David B. Lamkins wrote:
See attached files.
Configured using ASSERT_LEVEL_WANTED=0, the execution ratio improved
slightly to about 2:1.
Note that this test uses a wider range of ravel lengths. The execution
time ratio is pretty much constant, falling off only for the smallest
(100 element) ravels.
I did monitor the system this time. All 8 cores were busy at near to
100% utilization. Memory utilization remained below the swap threshold
during the entire test.
