On 5 March 2014 19:12, Daniel H. Leidisch <li...@leidisch.net> wrote:
I don't think that the support for tacit programming in modern APL > implementations counts as "pure SO APL". :) Then again, I'm not sure > what "SO" means, assuming the "S" stands for standard. > Oh, you don't know what SO means? It's the international misspelling of ISO. :-) Jokes aside, while I'm all in favor of such extensions for tacit > programming (composition, currying, hooks/forks/trains, as in NARS2000, > NGN, newer versions of Dyalog, J), I think proper lambdas are a much > more important and fundamental issue. What is a fork and a train? I've heard the expression before, but I don't know what it is. Regards, Elias
