Samuel Thibault (2016/07/07 08:44 +0200): > Shérab, on Thu 07 Jul 2016 07:02:49 +0200, wrote: > > Dave Mielke (2016/07/06 23:54 -0400): > > > First: It's saying that the encoding in the XML header (utf-8) isn't > > > matching > > > the encoding in the HTTP header (iso-8859-1). This is correct although > > > I'm not > > > sure why because the HTML HEAD section does have: > > > > > > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"/> > > > > I believe this meta thing could be removed because it is redundant with > > the HTTP headers sent by nginx as can be seen with > > It's not redundant when you save the file locally, and then read it > again with your browser.
The document should certainly speficy its encoding, indeed. I still believe this can safely be removed because line 1 of the file says <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> which already specifies the encoding. Unless this is cosidered less universal than the meta element, of course. Shérab. _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
