Samuel Thibault, on Sun 07 Feb 2016 00:25:20 +0100, wrote:
> Didier Spaier, on Sun 07 Feb 2016 00:09:56 +0100, wrote:
> > I attach the font used, that presents no caveat for a sighted user.
> 
> Ok, I see that it shares the same glyph for U+0000 and U+0020.
> Perhaps brltty gets confused by this. Dave, any idea?

I guess we could special-case the glyph that represents U+0020 as being
always reported as U+0020 to avoid the confusion when the font does
funky things like this.

Samuel
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty

Reply via email to