On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:18:39AM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote:
> [quoted lines by Dave Mielke on 2012/06/06 at 10:14 -0400]
>
> >What about just using "always full ="? Are there cases wherein that fails?
>
> Okay, I'll answer my own question. The word "wonderfully" would be a case
> where that wouldn't work.
ARGH! I knew I should have checked the rest of my mail. :-)
> I think, though, that "endword full =" would work. What do
> you think?
Yes, that seems to be good. Here's a new patch...
--
Lee Maschmeyer
"Never imagine yourself not to be otherwise than what it might appear
to others that what you were or might have been was not otherwise than
what you had been would have appeared to them to be otherwise."
--Lewis Carroll
Index: Tables/en-us-g2.ctb
===================================================================
--- Tables/en-us-g2.ctb (revision 6558)
+++ Tables/en-us-g2.ctb (working copy)
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@
contraction fr
word fruity =
midendword ful 56-123
+endword full = overfull
always funder 124-136-1345-145-12456
# the letter g
_______________________________________________
This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list.
To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc
For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
