Shérab <sebastien.hinde...@ens-lyon.org> writes: > Hello, > > Mario Lang (2011/06/01 16:26 +0200): >> Yes, you're unfortunately right, while the table format is roughly >> the same (not identical AFAIK), the contents seems to be quite different >> and maintained by separate people. I just checked this for the german >> grade 2 contraction, which has indeed been developed >> completely separately from the version I wrote for brltty. >> >> That said, the liblouis version is definitely better regarding >> exceptions, so I will have to sit down and attempt a merge >> of the good ideas from liblouis's table. >> >> Its kind of said to see so much duplicated work though. > > Agreed. Before any merge is attempted, shouldn't we discuss the > possibility that both brltty and liblouis use the same table format ? Or > even better, that brltty uses liblouis to contract braille ?
I think this is sort of a well known and old problem. As I remember, liblouis actually evolved from what brltty uses internally. Regarding using liblouis directly, which sounds good of course, I am guessing that brltty uses some low level functionality that liblouis might not export? -- CYa, ⡍⠁⠗⠊⠕ _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
