On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 10:13:26PM -0400, Dave Mielke wrote: > [quoted lines by Daniel Dalton on 2009/03/10 at 10:50 +1100] > > >> Hmm. My spelling checker flags reliableness as an error. Isn't that a > >> valid > >> word? Reliability might be a better choice but still... > > > >Appears to be "reliableness" (from english oxford dictionary. > > I don't know about dictionaries, but, to me, "reliableness" is not a word. I > believe it should be "reliability". This being said, the (non-)word > "reliableness" is clear and would hardly be noticed as an error. >
Yes, I thought the same, but that's what the dictionary contains... :-) > >BTW, uebg2 (brltty), shows that word wrong, it uses the en contraction > >followed by ess... Any way to make it do e then dots 56 S? > > Done. Thanks! > > >Not a big issue just thought I would mention it... :) > > These tables need to be right so, please, always point out even small > problems. No worries, I'll do that then. Cheers, Daniel. _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: [email protected] For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
