Hi, Dave Mielke, le Tue 29 May 2007 19:33:21 -0400, a écrit : > [quoted lines by George Kraft IV on 2007/05/29 at 15:56 -0500] > > >Getting the stable release is more important than a well documented > >ChangeLog. ;-) > > That's how I feel. The code is stable now. The change log can always come > later. The only problem is that people who want to know what the changes have > been won't be able to easily find the list. Looking in 3.8.1 for the changes > that brought about 3.8 is a bit unintuitive. Doing the job right really does > require a good change log, but, given the size of the job, that'd put your > proposed deadline at risk unless, of course, I put the rest of my life on > immediate hold.
Mmm, I'd say a very verbose ChangeLog is not so useful. Maybe a quite simple changelog with big pictures would be enough? For instance, concerning the API, "huge renaming, see man brlapi_deprecated ; Added Caml, Java, Lisp, Python and Tcl bindings ; added suspend mode ; added multi-connexion support ; added user/group-based authentication ; better unicode support". Concerning Windows, "Version-free and relocatable compilation". And "(Almost) ported to MS-DOS". Samuel _______________________________________________ This message was sent via the BRLTTY mailing list. To post a message, send an e-mail to: BRLTTY@mielke.cc For general information, go to: http://mielke.cc/mailman/listinfo/brltty
