On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Dan Minette <danmine...@att.net> wrote:
> >I really wouldn't feed the troll any more, if I were you... > > I think I have a narrower definition of troll than you do. I accept that > folks can have understandings of the world that I see has having internal > inconsistencies. I think that John is not putting forth a false front; I > think he posts in good faith. So, I'll debate points until I find that I > stop seeing the debate going anywhere. > Dan-- John Williams's: >On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Nick Arnett <nick.arn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I could tell the horror story of our efforts at loan modification, but I'll >> just say that it is one of the stories submitted to the Justice Department >> by the House California Caucus. >If by loan modification, you mean getting someone else to pay back >some of the money that you borrowed, you might want to consider that >it is likely that it will ultimately be average taxpayers footing the >bill, and whether it is fair that taxpayers who did not agree to your >mortgage should have to pay some of it off. cannot be seen as written in good faith. Williams does not know Nick's story. He simply assumes Nick is a scumbag, and posts accordingly. He then digs in to his position--and winds up claiming that anybody who borrows anything from anyone at any time is a dishonorable scumbag. If I were you, I wouldn't feed this troll any more... Brad DeLong
_______________________________________________ http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
