On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 2:00 PM, John Williams <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> No, that is not what I am talking about. I am talking about freedom to
> choose what to do with one's money.


Me, too.  Freedom for a nation to choose what to do with its money, just
like corporations and people are free to choose.

How can you insist that for a nation to *choose *to provide health care to
all of its citizens is taking away freedom?  Is freedom threatened by the
nation choosing to provide highways, police, fire, education and so forth to
everyone?  Are those services bad because they are run by government?
Where's the consistency in this argument?  Freedom to choose is still
freedom to choose when everyone makes the choice by democratic means.
That's our nation's very definition of freedom.

Nick
_______________________________________________
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Reply via email to