On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Dan M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, John, do you quote this paper as yet another example of what you > consider nonsense?
I do not consider it "nonsense", as I don't consider most economics arguments to be "nonsense". Or, to put it positively, I think it makes as much sense as many other economics arguments that I am familiar with. Which is to say, plausible, but not entirely convincing, since contradictory views can also be argued plausibly. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
