> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bruce Bostwick
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2008 12:39 PM
> To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
> Subject: Re: choice...
> 
> On Nov 8, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Dan M wrote:
> 
> >> it was not my preference to accept the banks terms.  my options were
> >> limited to signing the loan. or not buying a home.  i did what the
> >> realtor
> >> said because that is the way the system works.
> >
> > Let me jump in here.  You know I've been arguing against John a good
> > deal on
> > this subject, but let me now look at things from another
> > perspective, since
> > I think that the sub-prime mess is not just about
> > deregulation....that other
> > fundamental problems are involved.
> >
> > I'm not sure when you bought your house, but I originally bought
> > mine late
> > in '92, and was able to obtain a beautiful 3000 sq. ft. house in a
> > desirable
> > neighborhood with a mortgage payment of about $850/month.  I
> > followed the
> > market, including refinancing, and was always able to borrow 80% of
> > appraised value for <7% interest. The terms were always 30 year,
> > with no
> > balloon payment.  I did take a variable rate on my last loan, but
> > that was
> > because I knew I would be selling the house by now.  This was all in
> > the
> > Houston area.
> >
> > To my surprise, a couple of years ago my daughter was able, in mid-
> > Virginia,
> > able to obtain a 5% down loan for an interest rate that was, IIRC,
> > in the
> > 6%-7% range, fixed with no balloon payments (I asked before she took
> > the
> > loan).
> >
> > So, I'd be interested in exploring why our experience has been
> > different
> > from yours.  I have some possible candidates, but I think this
> > exploration
> > would reveal some of the contributing problems to the present housing
> > situation.
> >
> > Finally, now that we are renting, we are paying for 1300 sq. ft.
> > less than
> > the mortgage our buyers are paying for 3000 sq. ft.  It doesn't make
> > financial sense to rent here if you plan on staying put.
> >
> > Dan M.
> 
> The difference can often be one between a realtor who is genuinely
> motivated to act as his/her buyer's agent and negotiate aggressively
> for a good deal for the buyer, and one who is motivated more by a
> desire to get the commission from the sale and inclined to push the
> buyer into a fairly adverse deal just to close the sale.  

First of all, the buyer rarely pays the realtor.  Thus, the realtor I have
used the most in my life (once to help me find a rental property, twice to
buy a house, and once to sell a house) told me explicitly that legally she
represented the seller when I was the buyer/renter, so I should not count on
her to look after my interest.

Further, I didn't go to my realtor to get a loan. The second time, I had a
loan guarantee set up before I did my serious house shopping.  I followed
the interest rates carefully, and knew what was available. 

Isn't it the job of buyers to shop?  I know, when I go to my regular bank
location, they have advertisements for their mortgage rates in the lobby.
They are the second biggest bank in the nation (Chase), so they certainly
fund a lot of mortgages. So, while I think this is part of the problem,
something else has to be going on.  

For a purchase as big as a house, it has to be worth a few hours on the
phone or in the car asking banks about their loan terms.

Dan M.



The
> population of actively working realtors in this country does include a
> fairly significant number who are best described as unethical slime
> (not my words, those of a realtor friend who sees the worst of the
> business every day), and a fair number of others who are basically
> honest but largely incompetent, and even a few who are fairly
> unethical *and* not all that good at navigating the business for
> themselves, let alone buyers/sellers.
> 
> I always wonder what's going on when I hear about a buyer or seller
> who "did what the realtor said", because it seems to me that that
> power balance is exactly backwards if that's how it's really working
> for them.  (And there are realtors who won't talk to you until they
> have a signed buyer agreement from you, and after that point, feel
> free to do a least-common-denominator level of work for you because
> they know they have you contractually bound to them and they literally
> *can't* be fired at that point.)
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to