>>"(08-12) 17:25 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the
University of California can deny course credit to applicants from
Christian high schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible
and reject evolution.
Rejecting claims of religious discrimination and stifling of free
expression, U.S. District Judge James Otero of Los Angeles said UC's
review committees cited legitimate reasons for rejecting the texts -
not because they contained religious viewpoints, but because they
omitted important topics in science and history and failed to teach
critical thinking....
Aren't these the same folks who scream that Gays and Lesbians who ask for basic
civil rights are seeking "sepcial treatment"? Why do Fundamentalism and
hypocrisy so often seem to go together?
Olin
----- Original Message -----
From: William T Goodall<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Brin-L<mailto:[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 7:01 AM
Subject: Sanity prevails
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/13/BAQT129NMG.DTL&type=printable<http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/13/BAQT129NMG.DTL&type=printable>
"(08-12) 17:25 PDT SAN FRANCISCO -- A federal judge says the
University of California can deny course credit to applicants from
Christian high schools whose textbooks declare the Bible infallible
and reject evolution.
Rejecting claims of religious discrimination and stifling of free
expression, U.S. District Judge James Otero of Los Angeles said UC's
review committees cited legitimate reasons for rejecting the texts -
not because they contained religious viewpoints, but because they
omitted important topics in science and history and failed to teach
critical thinking.
Otero's ruling Friday, which focused on specific courses and texts,
followed his decision in March that found no anti-religious bias in
the university's system of reviewing high school classes. Now that the
lawsuit has been dismissed, a group of Christian schools has appealed
Otero's rulings to the Ninth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San
Francisco.
"It appears the UC is attempting to secularize private religious
schools," attorney Jennifer Monk of Advocates for Faith and Freedom
said Tuesday. Her clients include the Association of Christian Schools
International, two Southern California high schools and several
students.
Charles Robinson, the university's vice president for legal affairs,
said the ruling "confirms that UC may apply the same admissions
standards to all students and to all high schools without regard to
their religious affiliations." What the plaintiffs seek, he said, is a
"religious exemption from regular admissions standards."
The suit, filed in 2005, challenged UC's review of high school courses
taken by would-be applicants to the 10-campus system. Most students
qualify by taking an approved set of college preparatory classes;
students whose courses lack UC approval can remain eligible by scoring
well in those subjects on the Scholastic Assessment Test.
Christian schools in the suit accused the university of rejecting
courses that include any religious viewpoint, "any instance of God's
guidance of history, or any alternative ... to evolution."
But Otero said in March that the university has approved many courses
containing religious material and viewpoints, including some that use
such texts as "Chemistry for Christian Schools" and "Biology: God's
Living Creation," or that include scientific discussions of
creationism as well as evolution.
UC denies credit to courses that rely largely or entirely on material
stressing supernatural over historic or scientific explanations,
though it has approved such texts as supplemental reading, the judge
said.
For example, in Friday's ruling, he upheld the university's rejection
of a history course called Christianity's Influence on America.
According to a UC professor on the course review committee, the
primary text, published by Bob Jones University, "instructs that the
Bible is the unerring source for analysis of historical events" and
evaluates historical figures based on their religious motivations.
Another rejected text, "Biology for Christian Schools," declares on
the first page that "if (scientific) conclusions contradict the Word
of God, the conclusions are wrong," Otero said.
He also said the Christian schools presented no evidence that the
university's decisions were motivated by hostility to religion.
UC attorney Christopher Patti said Tuesday that the judge assessed the
review process accurately.
"We evaluate the courses to see whether they prepare these kids to
come to college at UC," he said. "There was no evidence that these
students were in fact denied the ability to come to the university."
But Monk, the plaintiffs' lawyer, said Otero had used the wrong legal
standard and had given the university too much deference.
"Science courses from a religious perspective are not approved," she
said. "If it comes from certain publishers or from a religious
perspective, UC simply denies them.""
Invisible Friends Maru
--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk<http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk/>
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/<http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/>
"Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit
atrocities." ~Voltaire.
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l<http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l>
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
