On Tue, 13 May 2008, sendai wrote:
> 2008/5/13 Ronn! Blankenship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> At 05:23 PM Monday 5/12/2008, jon louis mann wrote: >> > "snarkasm" - snark + sarcasm. >> > >> >http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=snark >> >> Are you suggesting it is redundant? > I think it's redundant. To my mind, most sarcasm is meant to be snarky > (fitting the definition of sarcasm along the way.) > >> >> Perhaps For Emphasis Maru > To emphasise sarchasm? > >> >> . . . ronn! :) > > -- > - sendai It was sarcasm with some extra bite to it, was the thing. Plus, this was a mailing list on which you can make up any ol' word you want, and if it *looks* cromulent, it'll fly. Julia _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
