On 9/21/07, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I don't get the exact meaning but presumed you were suggesting > > something about my mental state. In other words you were attacking my > > character rather than the argument. Is this not a perfect example of > > an ad hominem? > > No, because he wasn't tying a rebuttal to the exasperation. > > "You're wrong because you're angry" is ad hominem. "Calm down" isn't.
Aah! Right, no more Latin. Martin _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
