On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Dave Land wrote:
> On Aug 27, 2007, at 6:49 AM, Martin Lewis wrote: > >>> I think also this could impinge upon 5th amendment debates. >> >> Which one is that? > > It must suck not to have the Internet :-). > > As for the 5th amendment, it has to do with due process of law. Gee, with all that, why not go whole-hog and offer a Wikipedia link? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution Julia or you could just offer the text: No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
