Richard Baker wrote: > > So far as I can tell, Dawkins is talking about his friends at > universities in the UK and US, his point being that there are at > least some people for whom religion doesn't seem to be an innate part > of existence. I'd imagine that his friends tend to be more atheistic > than the rest of the population. I'd also imagine that nobody has > performed rigorous research on Dawkins' friends as a population. > Sampling from friends to prove something is very unscientific. Just to add unscience to the discussion, just because I know lots of vegetarians (and a few almost-pure carnivores) doesn't mean that I must reject the hypothesis that humans are omnivores.
Alberto Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
