On 24/11/2006, at 6:20 AM, Andrew Crystall wrote:
On 23 Nov 2006 at 2:59, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
Surprising result about human DNA:
<<http://news.independent.co.uk/world/science_technology/
article2007490.ece>>
Post-Darwinian genetics has been something which has been mumbled
about for a few years now.
"Post-Darwinian genetics"??? *All* genetics is post-Darwin. What
precisely do you mean?
I predict a fair amount of grumbling over
this from...some scientists. This does tilt a sway which was pointing
increasingly towards nurture back quite heavily towards nurture,
Which one of those "nurture"s should have been "nature"?
Charlie
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
