Let's put it this way: I flatly reject that it is "common knowledge" since I have NEVER heard of a centuries old Catholic Pedophile Ring. Irregardless, saying its "common knowledge" in no way makes it true.
Let me be more blunt then: William, I think your statement is bull and I'm calling you out on it. I personally believe you are unable to support your position, and your statement that you are "not writing a paper" is in my opinion an excuse not to try to jusrtify your statements with real evidence. And since I am challenging YOUR statement, the burden of evidence is STILL yours. Damon. ------------------------------------------------------------ Damon Agretto [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum." http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html Now Building: Trumpeter's Marder I auf GW 38(h) Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. ------------------------------------------------------------ Sent from my BlackBerry wireless handheld. -----Original Message----- From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:48:02 To:Killer Bs Discussion <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Religious freedom On 3 Sep 2006, at 8:37PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The point is, If I presented a paper that, FREX, the Fyrd was a > common element of the Anglo-norman army as "common knowledge," I > can guarantee I wouldn't make it too far. > But I'm not presenting a paper. And since it is common knowledge the burden is on you to show it isn't so if you disagree . -- William T Goodall Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/ Every Sunday Christians congregate to drink blood in honour of their zombie master. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
_______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
