On 6/28/06, Warren Ockrassa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is an aircraft that carries enough jet fuel to cover a football field to the depth of one foot with highly combustible fluid (do the math; check me -- this is what I recall from working out the figs myself about four years ago).
Even if that is true (and I've seen plenty of doubts), there was no jet fuel (which is kerosene, for those who don't know) in WTC 7. Yet it imploded neatly. At the least, it's weird. Of course, many seemingly weird things happen in nature, provoking superstition until somebody figures out the underlying mechanism. I don't know what to think. I find myself wondering how many people would have had to have been directly involved and how they could all stay quiet if something really was cooked up. But maybe it wouldn't have had to be very many... but so many indirectly. There are a lot of orders from that day that demand explanation, regarding security at the WTC, military drills, shoot-down orders, etc. So darn many coincidences. And yet it's hard to know if such coincidences would be found for any day of any year if we took the time to look. What bugs me the most is how very, very little has been spent on investigating and explaining, while so much evidence was lost forever. The outrage of fire investigators is appropriate. At the very least, we failed to learn a great deal that could go into designs to resist such attacks. Nick -- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages: 408-904-7198 _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
