---------- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It isn't whether it can penetrate it is how much penetrates, what is the energy of the penetrating em signal and where the penetration occurs. The study does not by the way prove that the em signal penetrates into the brain; the TMS signal may be affected by superficial stuff so the phone em signal may alter superficial processes such as blood flow. ---- A study I posted to this list last year showed that red blood cells could probably clump together from cell phone radiation. Another study I posted showed damage to corneas from cell phone radiation, and one I posted a long time ago show a correlation between corneal cancers and cell phone radiation. So that is obviously something that has been repeatedly shown to occur. ---- In any event the energy necessary to affect the electrical activity of neurons is very different than the energy necessary to induce cancer. The neurons are always exposed to chemical and em signals - EEGs are recordings of the electrical activity of the brain. These emission don't cause cancer or we would all have brain cancers (come to think of it there would be no "we all" in any sense if low level em caused cancer). ---- Individual molecules would resonate fairly well (cell phone use similar frequencies to microwaves). Wheras Dan has argued that in agregate the temperature change is small to negliable, I have argued that individual molecules may become super-heated and changed/damaged OR possibly change/damage other molecules / strucures / DNA. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
