On 08/05/2006, at 9:44 PM, Nick Arnett wrote:
On 5/7/06, Charlie Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So? Non-belief in the supernatural can't be "fundamentalist", there's
no scripture or dogma. I
Eh? Insistence on the non-existence of God *is* dogma.
Read what I said. That isn't what I said.
Any insistence on
the non-existence of something is dogma. It has to be, since it
cannot be
logically proved.
Non-belief and belief-in-not are *different*.
Charlie
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
