Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 09:00 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Julia Thompson wrote:
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
At 01:37 PM Thursday 5/4/2006, Dave Land wrote:
Gadzooks, you hit a nerve.
Now, I have to stop writing this email and get some work done for a
12:00 meeting.
I hope it is not significant in that context that the time stamp on
this message from you reads "1:37 PM" . . .
I'm Late!! I'm Late!! Maru
The timestamp I was seeing indicated it was sent at 1:37 here, which
would be 11:37 there. So I figured he had 23 minutes left. :)
Julia
Do I have to explicitly use the following .sig all the time? Hasn't it
been long enough for it to be just understood?
-- Ronn! :P
Professional Smart-Aleck. Do Not Attempt.
I'm going to take things on face value unless you have the .sig in
place. Unless you're responding to a silly-ish post in the first place.
Because sometimes you ARE serious and I'd like to not be blowing it off
just in case it's one of those times.
Deadpan, irony and sarcasm can be lost in a text-only environment in
which people don't explicitly tag. Some days I need to be hit with the
clue-by-four of an explicit tag. Days on which I'm sleep-deprived are
high on that list of days. And I haven't had more than 6 hours at a
stretch for about a week now. :)
Julia
sleep dep can be a wonderful mind-altering drug, but it sucks to have to
drive on it
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
