> From: Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> On Dec 15, 2005, at 5:55 AM, The Fool wrote:
> 
> > Furthering the tradition of being the first to respond to their own
> > posts I will include some further data points:
> >
> > Results 1 - 3 of about 5 for "king kong racism". (0.11 seconds)
> >
> > Results 1 - 10 of about 123,000 for "king kong" racism. (0.13
seconds)
> >
> > Results 1 - 10 of about 512,000 for king kong racism. (0.34
seconds)
> 
> Furthering the tradition of responding with nonsense, I will include
> some even further data points:
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 567,000 for sing song racism. (0.36 seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 116,000 for ling long racism. (0.98 seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 61,800 for wing wong racism. (0.64 seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 35,500 for ding dong racism. (0.34 seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 32,400 for wring wrong racism. (0.40
seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 100 of about 644 for bing bong racism. (0.12 seconds)
> 
> Results 1 - 4 of 4 for qing qong racism. (0.54 seconds)
> 
> Dave Land
> 
> (Hell, even jing jong racism got almost 600 hits)

Results 1 - 10 of about 494,000 for king kong racism -"donkey kong".
(0.34 seconds) 

Results 1 - 10 of about 75,700 for king donkey kong racism . (0.29
seconds)

_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to