At 03:44 PM Monday 8/1/2005, Dave Land wrote:
Folks,

George Lakoff, cognitive psychologist, linguist and leading light in the
science of "framing" debates, notes a change in the language that the
Bush administration is using to describe what it now terms the "global
struggle against violent extremism."

A key point:

    "... [D]ropping the [term] "war" while addressing the public
    will result in a shift in thinking in the public mind: If the
    war frame is not evoked in the public mind, the failure of the
    president's war policy will be less visible."

When it was a "war," it justified the President's tough-guy stance,
appeals to patriotism, practically unlimited resources and so on. Now
that it's a "struggle," there's no specific mission to accomplish, so
the failure to accomplish any specific mission is no big thing.


And the new acronym doesn't set off p_rn filters, either . . .


-- Ronn!  :)


_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

Reply via email to