> > That is a reasonable arguement. But, the question is, what sort of > > protection do they deserve.. Do they deserve protection against > > unpleasantness, as do real POWs? Is anything that could be called > > undignified unacceptable. Take the case in Time magazine. If this is the > > extreme treatment that was only authorized for a few high value prisioners > > (like the probable 20th hijacker) is that acceptable, or must > > Or must what, Dan?
we be resigned to asking only polite questions....without even the leverage available to police working with common criminals? Dan M. _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
