Deborah Harrell wrote:
Well, I say she's got big titanium ovaries...and my
prior decisions to limit documentation to frex "Spent
30 minutes discussing severe mental distress from
sexual abuse" are soooo justified (although that's
more because of my distrust of A. insurance companies
and B. secured access for records kept
electronically).
Excuse my ignorance, but what stops this practitioner from creating
documentation like your example, and then releasing it as the record of
therapy?
(Assuming of course, that she has not previously conceded the existence
of a more comprehensive document).
I guess the principle (that patients can talk freely because it won't be
revealed) is still compromised by this approach.
I wonder if you were subpoena'd one day and produced the one liner
record, would they believe you had complied with the court's
instruction, or would the court assume you were trying to thwart them.
Cheers
Russell C.
-------------------------------------------------------
This email (including any attachments) is confidential
and copyright. The School makes no warranty about the
content of this email. Unless expressly stated, this
email does not bind the School and does not necessarily
constitute the opinion of the School.
If you have received this email in error, please delete
it and notify the sender.
-------------------------------------------------------
<<<<GWAVAsig>>>>
_______________________________________________
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
