Atrocious. I commented right after your full and complete remark, which was right above.
Your claims of victimization are as credible as the president's. --- Leonard Matusik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess my comments would be rather > incommprehensible, if you're going to cut them away > from the thread they were attached to. (how rude and > self serving) > > I be happy to discuss the topic. > If, of course, you'd like to get beyond looking at > me like a bug through a microscope. > But Hell, it is your blog, do what you want. > > L.Matusik MSN,etc > > > > > > > David Brin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It was not even remotely comprehensible what point > was > intended here.... > > --- Leonard Matusik wrote: > > YAWN! > > Iraq has little to do with oil (though it'd be > nice > > to be able to bid on it in 10 years; shit, the > > India_China allience will be tough to bid against > by > > then) and mostly to do with "the white man's > > burden". If we're gonna keep our monoply on nukes > > and "trump card" power, (and we WILL, thank you > very > > much) then we have to be able to show that we can > be > > responsable ass-kickers (or more responsible that > > the competition) > > I wouldn't be surprised to see customer service > > surveys passed out in Iraq eventually. > _______________________________________________ > http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l > _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
